In a recent post I talked about the need for IT governance with just about any size company in order to manage their IT resources. Based on some feedback from colleagues and interaction with some of my clients I thought it might be best to revisit this topic and dive in with a little more background. In my experience IT governance (ITG) has always been a part of an organization's Project Management Office (PMO). But as a former colleague of mine recently pointed out not everyone is familiar with the workings of a PMO.
All of this alphabet soup usually gets people, especially the finance folks, very nervous thinking that technology department is about to become incredibly bureaucratic and expensive. While it's true that on many occasions this has been the case I'm here to tell you that it doesn't have to be that way. These constructs can be executed in very simple forms and with minimal overhead and administrative burden.
Before going much further I think it's fair for me to explain what I think the goals are for an ITG process. The ultimate goal of course is to make sure that technology resources are providing the most value to the firm but what does that mean? Well, for starters I have never seen a company that didn't have a demand for technology resources that exceeded the IT team's ability to respond - demand always exceeds the supply. So one of the most important roles of the ITG process is to provide a forum for vetting various ideas and needs within the organization and then prioritizing those initiatives. This provides direction to the IT staff. Secondly, IT has to give the business insight into the operations of the IT organization, IT needs to show them what they are getting for their investments. This means there has to be a level of transparency in IT, status reports on major initiatives should be reviewed and operational stats should be shared (ex: uptime stats or number of requests processed, etc.). And lastly the ITG process should serve as an opportunity for business and IT leaders to collaborate on corporate strategy and planning.
So with those goals in mind what do you need as a part of the ITG process? Again, it can be very simple but in some form or another you need a list of all those technology related requests - without it you can't very well vet them all to determine priorities. And as a part of that list you need to have some ballpark estimates regarding those requests, just rough guesses as to the effort/cost, value and time frame for these items. For example, is this a labor intensive project that could be done in a month that would yield incredible cost savings or allow you to enter a new segment of the market? These estimates don't have to be perfect, the point here is to get some relative benchmarks so that you can compare the ideas to each other and then make a decision as to which ones deserve further effort. For large projects this might mean approving a request so that more detailed research can be done to refine the costs and value and then return for a final approval before proceeding. This doesn't have to happen for all projects but if you are betting the future of the company on it you might want to have a couple of checkpoints along the way. :)
You also need to have some idea as to the throughput capabilities of your IT organization. Equally important to know that the priorities are is knowing how much of a dent you can make in that list. If the first item on the list is so large that it takes the entire IT staff the business might decide to instead tackle the next three items first to get some quick wins. Communicating your capacity plans also sets the stage in terms of expectations for project completion. Better for people to know right up front that a project is going to take six months than to not tell them and have them start playing the "Are we there yet?" game right out of the gate.
And I've already hinted at the third component of the ITG process - who needs to be involved. To be successful there has to be a representative from all the key business groups. For example you might need to include your finance and HR leaders as well as sales and customer service. And of course any heads of business lines. You don't want the group to get too big but it needs to represent all the elements that are needed to make your organization a success. In some organizations that means getting the C-level or EVP type folks responsible for these groups, in other companies it might be better to have people a layer closer to the action involved in this process. Whatever the group they need to have two things; an understanding of the tactical and strategic needs of the group they represent AND the authority to make investment decisions. One without the other does no good, you either end up spending lots of time and money on the wrong things or you are constantly waiting for someone who isn’t a part of the process to get back to you with final approval (i.e. more meetings to rehash all the details).
And that's about it. All you need to do now is do this on a regular basis - I recommend monthly with an extended meeting once a quarter to get into more strategic planning. Need help getting started? CETEC Consulting can help you with that.